An Analysis of Ideation
While
considerable attention has been paid to collection, and the development of the
collocational competence of L2 learners
in recent years, very little has been said about a related concept in teaching
journals, namely semantic prosody, and L2 learners awareness of this
phenomenon. In this paper the concept of semantic prosody is introduced, and
discussed, before and experiment is reported investigating the semantic prosody
awareness of three different sets of participants (university undergraduate
Arab students, Arab English teacher, and Native Speaker (NS) English teacher),
for seven lexical items for which specific
semantic prosody claims have been made by corpus linguists. The results
show that the data from the NS group (when considered as a group) concurred
with corpus observed semantic prosody tendencies for all seven items, but for
the other two sets of participants the result were
mixed regarding agreement. It would appear that for some items non-native users
of English of different language levels
appreciated the typical semantic prosody. For other items this was clearly not
the case, and it appears that semantic prosody awareness can be incremental, or
may not actually develop. Given the mixed data, it was suggested that explicit
instruction about semantic prosody in the classroom may be of some value to
learners.
Type of Process
No
|
Clause
|
Type of Process
|
1
|
While
considerable attention has been paid
to collection
|
Doing
|
2
|
very
little has been said about a
related concept in teaching journals
|
Saying
|
3
|
In
this paper the concept of semantic prosody is introduced, and discussed,
before
|
Thinking
|
4
|
and
experiment is reported
investigating the semantic prosody
|
Doing
|
5
|
for
which specific semantic prosody claims
have been made by corpus linguists
|
Being
|
6
|
The
results show that the data from
the NS group (when considered as a group) concurred with corpus observed semantic prosody
|
Doing
|
7
|
participants
the result were mixed regarding
agreement
|
Being
|
8
|
It
would appear that for some items
non-native users…
|
Being
|
9
|
English
of different language levels appreciated
the typical semantic prosody.
|
Having
|
10
|
For
other items this was clearly not
the case
|
Being
|
11
|
it
appears that semantic prosody
awareness can be incremental
|
Being
|
12
|
it
was suggested that explicit
instruction about semantic prosody
|
Doing
|
Interpretation
The first clause
including in Doing type of process,
it caused it was research method that held by the researcher, many clauses are
showed to an action explanation of the research, in this clause the writer
conveys very little has been said
about a related concept in teaching journals, the semantics prosody in this
text is an idea that explained by the writer, and will I explain next in
taxonomic relation, how it was evaluate by next clause. Followed as predicate
in second clause include to saying
distinguish type of process, very little has
been said about a related concept in teaching journals, it is clearly
explain how it was done, In this paper the concept of semantic prosody is
introduced, and discussed, before an experiment is reported investigating the semantic prosody are two clauses in a
series as thinking and doing type of process.
In
the text clause described for which specific
semantic prosody claims have been
made by corpus linguists was indicated as being of the research study,
after that clause followed clause The results show that the data from the NS group (when considered as a group) concurred with corpus observed semantic
prosody, Type of process sixth clause is doing,
because result is a concurred with corpus was observed and evaluated by the
researcher. By showing fact or result of the study the writer try to express
potential that involved in semantic prosody, in addition research objects were
mixed participants in order to the result regarding agreement and get objective
result from implementing semantic prosody of this research.
.
Taxonomic
Relation
Research
Collection
(co-part)
collocational
competence
(co-part)
teaching
journals
(co-part)
semantic
prosody
(member)
L2
learners awareness
(member)
seven
lexical items
(co-class)
corpus
linguists
(co-part)
semantic
prosody tendencies
(co-class)
explicit
instruction
(member)
Interpretation
To know each taxonomic
relation of the text above I extract text above to find idea that evaluated by
the researcher first idea is the semantic prosody or research variable of
his/her study, it has part, co-part, member, co-class, class taxonomic relation
belong to idea that was described by the writer as study or research variable which
construct the semantic prosody, such as Collection as member of research to
conduct his/her research so that collocational competence is an object especially in semantic
prosody so the writer described interrelation of each idea detail with all
surround of the object in his/her research, in other case the writer also
mentioned teaching journals that still part of the semantic prosody and it also
belong to part of focus research, in addition the writer suppose L2 learners awareness, corpus
linguists, seven
lexical item as distinguish type that it compare between corpus linguist, and I
consider that it was applied to the foreign language English students
especially Arabian, or may be the native speaker of Arabic, so it needs semantic
prosody with linguist corpus in order to easy to be understood by the students
who were not native speaker of English, in other clause the writer wrote explicit instruction which has interrelation with semantic prosody that
conduct the research for obtaining meaning.
People
of L2 learners in recent years
(synonym)
university
undergraduate Arab students
(synonym)
Arab
English teacher
(converse)
Native
Speaker (NS) English teacher
(converse)
Interpretation
The second idea which was
delivered by the writer is Participants, the participants of the text above are
not only L2 learners in recent years but also it has other
participants they are Arab English teacher, Native Speaker (NS)
English teacher, Native
Speaker (NS) English teacher and Arab English teacher are contrast with L2
learners in recent years and university undergraduate Arab students or it is converse, , so we
consider that Arab English teacher and Native Speaker (NS) English teacher is synonym in taxonomic relation, although they used different
language, relate to teacher and learners also mentioned any times it
indicates that main object of the
research is learners awareness or undergraduate students. Having described
method and participants, the writer also coveys it effectiveness if involved in
specific way of semantics prosody, and its effectiveness in teaching journal.
Post a Comment for "An Analysis of Ideation"